| 
 | 
| Useful links | ¡¡ JAMES W. 
FETT & KAREN A. OLSON                         
                         
 Research 
Activities   Tumor 
Therapy Experiments      Investigations 
to assess efficacy of angiogenin (Ang) antagonists for prevention of both establishment 
and metastatic dissemination of human tumors implanted into athymic mice were continued.     i) Therapy 
of human prostate cancer.     Metastatic 
tumors.   Combination of antiAng therapy with another 
antiangiogenesis agent.  The model of 
metastatic prostate cancer, well-established in the laboratory was used which involves the 
injection of the human prostate tumor cell line, PC-3M, into the surgically exposed 
prostates of athymic mice.  Metastasis 
subsequently develops in the local iliac lymph nodes. 
  We had previously shown using this model that both the Ang neutralizing mAb 
26-2F and the Ang antisense JF2S inhibit metastasis in 50% of the mice treated with either 
of these agents.  Increasing the dose of 
either agent does not produce a significant increase in efficacy. We also wished to 
determine if combination therapy directed against both Ang and another angiogenic factor, 
vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), could show either an additive or synergistic 
protection above that seen by either agent alone.  The 
first such experiment Ang antisense JF2S was administered along with an antisense directed 
against VEGF, JF17S, at a dose previously found to be optimal for JF2S. Interestingly, 
while the JF17S was not very protective by itself, addition of that dose of JF17S to the 
optimal dose of JF2S produced at least an additive increase in protection above that 
afforded by JF2S alone.  However, in two 
subsequent experiments, the VEGF antisense JF17S effectiveness in inhibiting metastasis 
was found to be actually only slightly below that of JF14S, when given at the most optimal 
dose for JF2S.  Repeating the combination of 
the two antisense each at this optimal dose did not produce an increased efficacy above 
either agent alone as had been previously observed.  When 
both antisense were given alone at a dose previously determined for JF2S to produce a 
decreased protection from metastasis, both agents exhibited similar low levels of 
antimetastatic activity.  Combination of these 
two antisense (at half of this dose for each) did, however, not show the expected additive 
effect.  As a result this particular 
combinatorial approach was abandoned.  However, 
experiments are underway to examine the effects of combining antiAng agents (e.g., 
antibody and antisense) in this model.   Efficacy of 
Ang antisense JF2S in preventing metastases in mice with established prostate tumors.  In the abovementioned prior work Ang antisense 
JF2S was shown to prevent metastasis in 50% of the treated mice in the orthotopic 
prostrate cancer model while all diluent, sense and scrambled [S]ODN controls developed 
metastasis.   In these experiments the 
treatments were given systemically one hour after the tumor cells were injected.  We, therefore, wished to determine if the 
antisense agent is effective in reducing metastasis when treatment is delayed until a 
primary tumor is established in the prostate and metastasis is histologically observed in 
a known percentage of the mice.  Two 
experiments were performed to first  ¡¡ 
 determine i) 
the time at which primary tumors are macroscopically observable following tumor  cell 
injection and ii) the percentage of mice which exhibit histologically observable 
metastasis at different time points following tumor cell injection into the prostate.  We found that primary tumors were present in all 
mice by day six.  The percentage of mice 
exhibiting metastasis was somewhat variable between the two experiments, but by day 32, 
ten days before the usual sacrifice date, 80% of the mice exhibited metastasis.  Based on these results two experiments were begun 
to test the capacity of JF2S to inhibit metastasis when treatment is delayed until day 14, 
28 or 32.  At each of these time points, 
additional untreated mice injected with tumor cells will be sacrificed to determine the 
percentage of mice at these points which harbor lymph node metastasis.    ii)  Therapy of human breast cancer.     Primary 
tumors.  In the previous reporting period we examined the 
efficacy of the Ang antisense JF2S in preventing primary tumor growth in an orthotopic 
model of estrogen-independent breast cancer in which the human breast cancer cell line 
MDA-MB-435 is injected into the surgically exposed mammary fat pad of athymic mice.  In two experiments using this model we observed 
that JF2S prevented 100% of the mice from developing primary tumors.  In the current reporting period this study was 
repeated twice more, in order to obtain sufficient numbers for statistical analysis, with 
the same results - 100% of the mice treated with Ang antisense failed to develop tumors.  In all four experiments, all mice injected with 
tumor cells and treated either with diluent, the Ang sense or the Ang scrambled [S]ODN 
control material developed tumors.    Metastatic 
tumors.  Orthotopic model.  Previously we had tested a new, highly metastatic 
human breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-435L2 (from Dr. Price, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center), 
in the orthotopic model of lung metastasis in which the cells are injected into the 
surgically exposed mammary fat pad of athymic mice with subsequent metastases developing 
at 12 weeks. With the use of this cell line the time required for the mice to form 
metastasis was reduced from the 20 weeks needed when the parental cell line (MDA-MB-435) 
was used.  As was done previously with other 
cell lines used in various tumor models, the effect of in vitro treatment of the 
MDA-MB-435L2 cells with Ang antisense JF2S was investigated.  JF2S both reduced the in vitro secretion of 
Ang by these cells and compromised the capacity of these ex vivo treated tumor 
cells to form primary tumors following their s.c. injection into athymic mice.  In our previous report we presented preliminary 
data which showed that systemic treatment with either mAb 26-2F or Ang antisense JF2S 
decreased the incidence of lung metastases (based on macroscopic observation) by 25% and 
43%, respectively.  We also wished to 
determine the extent of metastasis in those mice which were not completely 
protected by antisense or antibody treatment.  The 
measurements of lung weights are usually used in the field for this purpose, but we were 
concerned that weights as a measure of extent of metastasis were not sufficiently 
sensitive to be reliable for this purpose. Therefore four experiments were initiated in 
order to compare the use of lung weights to macroscopic and/or microscopic observation as 
a means of evaluating the efficacy of the Ang antisense JF2S in preventing metastases.  In addition, several experiments were performed in 
order to determine the optimum time of sacrifice which would result in reproducible, 
quantifiable metastases in control mice.  Thus 
far it appears that either macroscopic or microscopic observation at sacrifice at ten 
weeks is optimal.  Experiments thus far show a 
trend toward reduction in number of metastases in JF2S-treated mice.  We are currently testing different treatment 
protocols with JF2S and mAb 26-2F to optimize the protective effect of these agents and to 
obtain results that are statistically significant.             
 ¡¡ 
   iii) Therapy 
using neomycin and neomycin derivatives to inhibit tumor growth.                 
Dr. Guo-fu Hu of the Center has determined that neomycin is a potent inhibitor of 
Ang-induced angiogenesis.  In collaboration 
with him we have tested the capacity of neomycin to inhibit tumor growth in mouse models 
of human prostate, breast and colon cancer: i) while neomycin appeared to cause some 
inhibition of tumor appearance in a s.c. model of primary prostate tumor growth, technical 
problems involving the interaction of neomycin with Matrigel basement membrane material 
(necessary for the in vivo s.c. growth of prostate tumor cells) precluded further 
testing in this model.  ii)  three experiments were also performed in which 
neomycin was evaluated using the orthotopic breast cancer model with MDA-MB-435 cells.  The results, however, were variable.  In one experiment neomycin protected four mice 
from developing tumors when given i.p., while there was no protection when neomycin was 
administered s.c. In the second experiment there was no protection using either route, and 
in the third experiment four out of ten and one out of nine mice were protected from tumor 
development when given neomycin s.c. or i.p., respectively.  
Treatment with a dose three times that used in these experiments was found to be 
100% lethal. In the third experiment a derivative of neomycin, 6-aminoglucosamine, 
comprising one quarter of the neomycin molecule, was also tested in a limited number of 
mice.  However, it failed to protect any mice 
from tumor development, presumably due to its weak antiAng activity as determined by Dr. 
Hu.  iii) testing in a s.c. model of human 
colon cancer was also begun during this reporting period.  
Of major concern in performing these types of tumor experiments is the 
stability/availability of neomycin and derivatives in vivo, since they are known to 
be rapidly cleared.  Slow-release 
methodologies are therefore being investigated.  However, 
in the first colon tumor experiment, all mice died within five minutes after implantation 
of a commercially-available neomycin pellet although the dose within the pellet was 
theoretically within the tolerated dose range.  Further 
experiments will therefore be conducted to identify safe slow-release administration of 
neomycin and related compounds. 
            Drug 
Development    i)  Chimerized antibody.  A report describing the construction and 
anti-breast tumor activity of the chimerized version of murine mAb 26-2F appeared during 
1998 in the Proceedings of the National Cancer Institute.                 
ii)  Humanized antibodies.  Since in some cases an immune response directed 
against the mouse V region portions of chimeric antibodies can still occur in patients, 
fully humanized versions of murine mAbs constructed by CDR grafting and other techniques 
are emerging for use clinically.  As part of 
our drug development program, we will produce antiAng humanized antibodies in addition to 
the chimeric antibody already available. Toward this end we are collaborating with Dr. K. 
R. Acharya at the University of Bath, UK, an expert in x-ray crystallographic techniques 
and protein modeling and a continuing collaborator with this Center.   As an important step toward humanization, 
Dr. Acharya has collected a complete data set for the complex between the Fab fragment of 
mAb 26-2F and Ang and has nearly solved the structure using molecular replacement 
techniques.  This 3-dimensional structure, in 
which all critical contact amino acids will be known, will be invaluable for designing 
humanized antibodies as well as CDR-based peptides and mimetics.   ¡¡ 
   Immunohistochemical 
Analysis of Ang in Human Tissue Specimens    These 
studies are being performed in collaboration with Dr. Marc E. Key, Vice President of 
Laboratory Operations, Dako Corp.  Dako Corp. 
maintains a bank of paraffin-embedded human normal and malignant tissues.  In order to examine the incidence and distribution 
of Ang, Dr. Key has developed sensitive and specific staining techniques for detecting 
tissue-associated Ang protein.   Using 
mAb 26-2F he has begun screening clinical samples of normal and malignant prostate tissue.  In this continuing study, Dr. Key and associates 
have examined approximately 20 types of human tissues, both normal and malignant.  Several tumor tissues (e.g., breast, prostate, 
kidney, colon) stain positively for the presence of Ang whereas normal tissues, for the 
most part, are not stained.  Ang, therefore, 
may play a role in a diverse set of human cancers.  Presently, 
contacts are being made with pathology core facilities of the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer 
Center in order to examine tissue specimens from a greater number of patients of one 
particular tumor in order to correlate the presence of Ang with such clinical features as 
diagnosis, stage, grade, outcome, etc.   It 
is possible that Ang may serve as a useful biomarker for human cancers.       Differential 
Expression of Ang Protein and mRNA in Cancer            i) As 
alluded to above, Ang may be useful as a biomarker for certain human cancers.  As an adjunct to the immunohistochemical studies 
proposed above, we are obtaining serum and urine samples from prostate cancer patients 
from Drs. Kenneth Falchuk and Jerome Richie, both of the Brigham and Women¡¯s Hospital.  These are being tested by ELISA for the presence 
of Ang and compared to PSA levels.  Very early 
results indicate that Ang may be elevated, along with PSA in patients with late-stage 
disease.  These studies are ongoing.    ii) 
Molecular profiling of tumor tissue for the presence of Ang mRNA together with expression 
other angiogenesis-related genes has been initiated utilizing commercially-available 
microarrays.  Dr. Martinelli, Millennium 
Pharmaceuticals, serves as a consultant for these investigations.  For initial studies RNA has been isolated from two 
prostate cancer cell lines grown in vitro - one more metastatic than the other.  Differential analysis indicates that Ang message 
is upregulated in the more metastatic cell type.  Thus, 
Ang may play a role in the metastatic phenotype of prostate cancer.  Similar studies are underway examining different 
human tumor cell lines grown orthotopically in athymic mice. Future plans call for 
examining human tumor species in a similar fashion.      Collaborators/Consultants 
   K. Ravi 
Acharya, Ph.D. 
                        
            
University of Bath H. Randolph 
Byers, M.D., Ph.D. 
               Boston 
University School of Medicine Kenneth H. 
Falchuk, M.D. 
                
            
CBBSM & Brigham and Women's Hospital Jack T. 
Johansen, Ph.D. 
                           
Boston BioSystems      Mark E. Key, 
Ph.D.                          
            
Dako Corp. Richard 
Martinelli, Ph.D. Millennium Pharmaceuticals Janet E. 
Price, Ph.D.                         
            
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Jerome 
Richie, M.D. Brigham and Women¡¯s Hospital     Publications 
- James W. Fett & Karen A. Olson   Verselis 
S.J., Olson K.A., Fett J.W. (1999) Regulation of Angiogenin Expression in Human HepG2 
Hepatoma Cells by Mediators of the Acute Phase Response.  Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 259: 
178-184.   Olson K.A., 
Byers H.R., Key M.E., Fett J.W.  Prevention 
of Human Prostate Tumor Metastasis in Athymic Mice by Antisense Targeting of Human 
Angiogenin.  Submitted.     Support   Department 
of Defense.  RP951418.  ¡°Novel Antiangiogenic/Cytotoxic Therapies for 
Advanced Breast Cancer.¡±  09/01/96 - 
08/31/00. $453,433 direct costs. James W. Fett, P.I.; Karen A. Olson, 30% effort   Award - CaP 
CURE Association. ¡°Angiogenin and Prostate Cancer: Therapeutic Opportunities and 
Proteomic/Transcriptional Profiling¡± 1999. $100,000. 
  James W. Fett & Karen A. Olson - CoPIs     Teaching   Advances in 
Medical Biology Seminar (CEM 4105).  Leader of 
weekly HMS/BWH-accredited seminars in the Center which fulfill type I credits for 
Continuing Medical Education; 20-40 scientists, physicians, graduate and medical students, 
and visiting professors.  10-20 hours/year. James 
W. Fett & Karen A. Olson     Meetings 
attended   90th 
Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, PA, April 
10-14, 1999.   James W. Fett & 
Karen A. Olson   6th 
Annual CaP CURE Annual Retreat, Lake Tahoe, NV, October 14-17, 1999.  James W. Fett & Karen A. Olson     Invited 
presentations - James 
W. Fett    ¡°Angiogenin: 
Opportunities for Research and Clinical Studies¡±. 
  Symposium - Tools for Drug Discovery, The Angiogenesis Model.  Sponsored by Chemicon Intl., Inc., Philadelphia, 
PA.  April 9, 1999.   ¡°Angiogenin 
- Therapeutic Opportunities¡±.  5th 
International Meeting on Ribonucleases, Warrenton, VA. 
  May 13, 1999.   ¡°Angiogenin: 
Role(s) in Prostate Cancer¡±.  6th 
Annual CaP CURE Annual Retreat, Lake Tahoe, NV, October 14, 1999.     Other 
- James W. Fett    Served on 
the Pathobiology 4 Study Section, Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program.  Vienna, VA, August 29-31, 1999. |